Eliminate entitlement risk
before you commit capital.
Submit a property. RealClear turns zoning codes, staff reports, hearing records, utility filings, community source records, and comparable outcomes into a cited entitlement risk brief within 24 hours.
Entitlement is no longer local knowledge. It's a source-record problem.
Full dashboard on desktop · view the sample workspace
Case files · same evidence standard · click any chip to open the file
Five cited review areas,
running in parallel.
Each track answers a question that can wreck budget, calendar, or both: is it by-right, who can stop it, how often approvals clear here, and where the record already shows risk. Every finding cites its source.
One real approval path, end to end.
The path a $1B data-center project actually ran — from filing to withdrawal in 183 days. Every veto point flagged.
- FiledMar 2025Deep Meadow Ventures files rezoning 2025-CZN-814 for 467.66 acres
- Hearing exam.Apr 10, 2025Petition hits hearing examiner agenda — formal entitlement track begins
- RemonstranceJun 12, 2025Public hearing · remonstrance surfaces · case continued to June 26
- MDC 8-1Aug 20, 2025MDC approves rezoning 8-1 — but project still faces Council call-downVeto point
- Hart on-recordSep 2025Councilor Hart on record against project (WTHR) — Council math hardensVeto point
- WithdrawnSep 22, 2025Google withdraws before scheduled Council voteWithdrawal
Start with the ordinance. Finish with a defensible memo.
Research → synthesize → memo. One real, approved end-to-end path. Watch it build, top to bottom.
Before the petition. Before the room turns against you.
Local press, public records, and public comments tied back to the site before the hearing calendar hardens.
Four kinds of source. All tied back to the parcel.
Public records, local reporting, public comments, and project materials become the source set for a submitted property. Every number in the brief ties to its source. Every quote ties to a filing, article, or agenda.
One brief for IC, underwriting, and counsel.
Each review area lands in the same brief, with source references and an audit trail that stays in your account.
- ZoningD-A → C-S rezoning · FF/FW flood overlays flagged
- Pathway2 veto points · MDC + full-council call-down
- Community2,400+ petition signatures · organized remonstrance
- Comparablesag-to-commercial + remonstrance + veto path
- ReportEXTREME DENIAL RISK · withdrawal was the rational endgame
Before underwriting hours. Before the calendar starts spending real money.
Your parcel gets a pattern-match against 222 hand-researched fights that already happened. Same posture, same opposition signatures, same veto geometry. The comparable read tells you which sites survive contact with a council and which never should have been underwritten.
Where the calendar bites first. Where the same playbook applies.
$156B in U.S. data-center development was blocked or delayed in 2025 alone. That is where the budget is heaviest, the calendar is least forgiving, and the political cost of being wrong is largest. The same method now reads the same record for senior living, multifamily, QSR + retail, industrial, and energy.
Hyperscale entitlement risk, cited. Before you commit capital.
The public-record trail that changes approval risk: moratoriums, water fights, noise rules, utility filings, opposition coalitions, and comparable outcomes. Every property enters the same 24-hour cited research queue.
24h
Cited first brief
Every
Material claim cited
$156B
Blocked or delayed
Do not spend real money on a site before the deal killers are clear.
Entitlement diligence costs $50K–$260K and the calendar that goes with it. If the use is not by right, the path is ugly, or the local politics are wrong, you want to know that before counsel reads the first page of the local zoning code. Screen the site first.