Loading
Loading
Solar, BESS & Energy
Agricultural-solar bans. Battery fire moratoriums. State siting council overrides. Definitional voids that leave your use classification up to a split vote. The 195 MW AES Hardy Hills project lost an Indiana CPCN over 1,800 acres of farmland. The material evidence was already in the public record.
24 hr
Cited research
12+
States
5
Fight Patterns Tracked
Source record review · solar & energy
Farmland politics, state siting councils, and serial-denial coalitions. Three participants now set the cited case-file template across their respective jurisdictions.
Sumter County BZA
Sumter, SC · 3-of-3 denials
Ada County Commissioners
Idaho · triggered county code rewrite
Connecticut Siting Council
CT · state-level forest-clearing veto
Open any case file for the source records, participant role, and method note behind the weighting.
02THE FIGHT
Every one of these patterns has killed a real project — and most of them had nothing to do with the developer’s project quality. RealClear surfaces all five before you pay the option.
County-level prime-soil ordinances are the single most common kill switch for utility-scale solar. Ada County, Idaho: one 2,400-acre denial triggered a code rewrite banning solar on prime irrigated farmland. Richland County, Ohio: commissioners passed a moratorium on farmland solar while applications sat in queue. Soil-class designation — Prime Farmland, Statewide Importance — is now a threshold question before any Indiana, Ohio, or Illinois option is signed.
The Moss Landing fire in Monterey County sent emergency ordinances to 14 adjacent jurisdictions before the smoke cleared. Escondido killed a 320 MW AES BESS — not because of the project's safety record, but because two nearby facilities caught fire first. Morro Bay followed. The cascade is structural: one fire in the media market, one emergency session, one moratorium. BESS queue positions become worthless overnight. RealClear researches active moratoriums and emergency battery-storage ordinances for submitted sites.
NY ORES, Illinois Solar 8, Michigan PA 233 — each state created a siting council specifically to override local opposition to renewable energy. None of them are guaranteed. The Connecticut Siting Council rejected Lodestar Energy's 3.0 MW solar farm over forest clearing. Michigan townships appealed PA 233 to the Court of Claims. Illinois HB 4412 spent two sessions in committee. Preemption status moves. RealClear's Approval path review identifies which states have siting authority, which conditions activate it, and which recent council decisions show a tightening posture before your township board vote.
Corry, Pennsylvania's R-1 zoning code has no definition for utility-scale solar. The Planning Commission denied it in a split vote — debating whether solar panels are a residential use, a commercial use, or an industrial use. Pennsylvania law still hasn't resolved it. When no definition exists in the adopted ordinance, you are asking the board to make law in real time. The result is a coin flip. RealClear flags absent, ambiguous, or contested solar classifications in the submitted site's record.
Queue position is not entitlement. Developers hold MISO or PJM interconnect agreements on sites that have not cleared local zoning — and lose both when entitlement stalls. The inverse is equally lethal: a by-right entitlement on a parcel with a three-year interconnection queue means you are holding a landowner agreement and an option payment against a calendar you cannot control. RealClear maps the entitlement pathway against known interconnection queue depth for the relevant ISO region — so your team knows the binding constraint before the option payment clears.
03THE RECORD
Utility solar, BESS, and energy infrastructure entitlement outcomes across 12+ states. Every case backed by primary source documents — IURC filings, county ordinances, state siting council opinions, court records.
04CASE FILE
AES Indiana filed for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity at the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission in 2020. The site: 1,800 acres across Union and Owen Townships in Clinton County. The use type: utility-scale solar, 195 MW. The IURC approved it in June 2021. Hardy Hills went commercial in May 2024. On paper, a clean outcome.
What the public record shows — and what developers screening adjacent Indiana counties in 2020 couldn’t see without deep research — is that merchant solar in Fulton, Madison, and White counties was running into serious opposition during the same period. Agricultural land designation. Farmland preservation groups. County commissioners who had watched other jurisdictions pass solar moratoriums and were not inclined to be test cases. The fights were not about energy policy. They were about soil class, option density, and the political liability of being the first board to approve a merchant export project.
RealClear’s Comparable outcomes review would have surfaced the ownership-structure pattern before the first landowner agreement was executed. IURC-regulated utility ownership reframes the benefit calculus: the electricity serves local ratepayers, not an out-of-state offtaker on a merchant PPA. That distinction is not in the zoning ordinance. It is in the comparable record — in how prior boards voted, and what arguments moved them. Merchant solar in rural Indiana is a different political problem than utility solar. Same panels. Different fight.
The Clinton County approval was not luck. It was structure. AES Indiana secured the IURC CPCN before approaching county zoning — establishing public utility status before the township board could characterize the project as a private exporter. The ag-soil opposition that stalled projects in adjacent counties never fully materialized in Clinton County because the rate-recovery and tax-revenue framing was established first, through the utility proceeding, before the county process opened.
That is the pattern match. Not whether Indiana approves solar — Indiana does, under the right structure. But whether your project enters county zoning as a regulated public asset or as a merchant infrastructure play on prime farmland. RealClear reads 20 energy case files. That distinction appears across six of them.
RealClear Score · AES Hardy Hills Solar
Scored 75/100. Utility-ownership structure materially reduces political opposition. Merchant solar on Indiana prime farmland without rate-benefit framing scores 30–45. Same site. Different structure. Different outcome.
05BEFORE THE OPTION
Clean energy meets local opposition. Agricultural-solar bans, BESS moratoriums, state preemption fights — the energy-entitlement landscape moves monthly.
RealClear reads the township before you commit the option payment. Ag-soil class. Queue position. Interconnect agreement timing. Comparable outcomes from adjacent jurisdictions. Scored and cited before the landowner agreement leaves your desk.
Keep reading