What happened
The town's SEQR page lists the October 2 findings and resolution K1. The resolution identifies the 1292 Route 9D parcel and concludes the proposal did not satisfy the substantial-similarity criteria, preventing special-use and site-plan approval in that posture K2.
Decision on recordThe Fishkill Planning Board adopted environmental findings and a resolution that the proposed 1292 Route 9D self-storage facility was not substantially similar to uses allowed in its Restricted Business district, so it could not grant the requested special-use or site-plan approvals. K2:p9
Who acted in the record
Town of Fishkill Planning Boardlocal decision body
Adopted the resolution determining the use ineligible for requested approvals. K2:p9
How RealClear would approach this site
Historical reconstruction: RealClear was not involved in the recorded proceeding; this is how a one-property review could have organized its public record, not a predicted vote.
Is this use allowed or substantially similar in the RB district?
- Record to read
- Zoning use list, SEQR findings and October resolution
- Constraint to test
- The board found the use did not meet all required substantial-similarity criteria.
- Next action
- Resolve use classification before commissioning a full site plan or assuming a special-use path.
The boundary of the finding
- A later developer lawsuit is not established by this decision record; do not assert it without the docket.
Latest cited status: 2025-10-02