Skip to content
← All case files
Public record / Special uses

Bensalem settlement permitted mosque use after variance denial

Bensalem Township and the United States executed a settlement permitting religious institutional use at three Hulmeville Road parcels; DOJ allegations were resolved without an adjudicated finding of liability. S2

SettledRecorded September 1, 2017
Editorial illustration · not a photograph of the property
01 / The recorded outcome

What happened

The DOJ case page dates the settlement September 1, 2017 and describes the 2016 complaint as allegations after a variance denial S1. The executed agreement identifies 3743, 3805 and 3825 Hulmeville Road and permits mosque use subject to the related private consent order and further application processing S2.

Decision on recordBensalem Township and the United States executed a settlement permitting religious institutional use at three Hulmeville Road parcels; DOJ allegations were resolved without an adjudicated finding of liability. S2
02 / People and public bodies

Who acted in the record

Bensalem Townshiplocal land-use authority and settlement party

Agreed to permit religious institutional use of the three parcels and review its ordinance. S2

U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Divisionpublic enforcement party

Filed the RLUIPA complaint and entered the settlement. S1S2

03 / A retrospective walkthrough

How RealClear would approach this site

Historical reconstruction: RealClear was not involved in this proceeding. This illustrates a one-property review of public records; it does not predict votes or private motives.

What restriction blocked the proposed religious use?

Record to read
2014 variance decision, DOJ complaint and executed settlement
Constraint to test
The settlement permits use but leaves construction plans to the related consent-order process.
Next action
Check parcel-specific order and later permits before treating the building as approved.
S1S2
04 / What this record does not establish

The boundary of the finding

  • DOJ’s discrimination allegations are allegations; the township maintained that it complied with RLUIPA.
  • The executed settlement references a separate private consent order, which should be read before claiming construction authorization.

Latest cited status: 2017-09-01 settlement; later building/occupancy status not verified

One property. A dated record. A clearer next move.

Explore more case files →