What happened
The Council’s March 24 agenda identifies the appealed denial at 8844 Burton Way S1. The city’s March 30 project list says Council approved it March 24 S3; its Builder’s Remedy table lists 200 total and 22 affordable units S2.
Who acted in the record
How RealClear would approach this site
Historical reconstruction: RealClear was not involved in this proceeding. This illustrates a one-property review of public records; it does not predict votes or private motives.
How could a denied project advance on appeal?
- Record to read
- commission denial, Council appeal packet and current city status
- Constraint to test
- Builder’s Remedy eligibility and environmental findings must be tied to this filing date.
- Next action
- Retrieve the adopted Council resolution and identify remaining permit conditions.
The boundary of the finding
- The city status table labels a link March 26 although the linked agenda and city project list say March 24; use the project list for decision date. Obtain signed minutes/resolution before asserting an exact vote or reversal rationale.
- The status table shows 125–129 South Linden as still in process following litigation; do not conflate that court procedure with this approval.
Latest cited status: 2026-09-29 city project-status page; approval listed, construction unverified
